Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Postgrad Med J ; 98(1166): 942-947, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1484062

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent reports show that about 10% of UK-graduate doctors leave the country to pursue specialty training elsewhere. Our article aims to evaluate the motivating factors for UK graduates to leave the National Health Service (NHS), especially during the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHOD: A novel 22-item questionnaire was disseminated at a webinar series regarding the application process to pursue residency training in six different countries/regions from 2 August 2020 to 13 September 2020. The data was analysed using Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum with post-hoc Wilcoxon test to compare the difference in significance among the motivating factors. RESULTS: 1118 responses from the UK medical students and doctors were collected; of which, 1001 (89.5%) were medical students, and 88 (7.9%) were junior doctors. There was a higher propensity for leaving after the Foundation Programme compared with other periods (p<0.0001 for all comparisons). There was no difference between desire for leaving after core surgical/medical training and specialty training (p=0.549). However, both were significantly higher than leaving the NHS after medical school (p<0.0001). Quality of life and financial prospects (both p<0.0001) were the most agreed reasons to leave the NHS, followed by clinical and academic opportunities and, subsequently, family reasons. CONCLUSION: Future work on the quality of life for doctors in the UK should be explored, especially among those considering leaving the NHS. Policymakers should focus on assessing the difference in working hours, on-call hours and wages that may differ among healthcare systems.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Students, Medical , Humans , Motivation , State Medicine , Cross-Sectional Studies , Quality of Life , European Union , Pandemics , United Kingdom , COVID-19/epidemiology
5.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 12: 887-894, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1360671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created a hiatus in in-person clinical assessments due to safety and logistical concerns. We aimed to evaluate student perception and utility of an online Integrated Structured Clinical Examinations (ISCEs) during the pandemic. METHODS: Final-year medical students from a single institution were offered an online mock ISCE through a student-to-student ("near-peer") teaching-programme. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted pre- and post-online mock ISCE. RESULTS: Sixty-four students completed the study. Pre- and post-data showed an increase in confidence (p<0.0001), less worry regarding the online format (p<0.0001) and less anxiety about excelling in ISCEs (p<0.001). Students felt that having done the mock, an online format would more positively affect their overall performance (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a positive change in student perception and confidence in online ISCEs. Online ISCEs are thus feasible, though sole reliance on this format may provide an incomplete assessment of student's overall clinical competency.

6.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211003687, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1140468

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the delivery of primary care in the NHS. Consultations have largely moved from face-to-face to remote, forcing practitioners to modify the ways in which they deliver care to patients. AIM: In this study, we aim to investigate the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in tonsillitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN AND SETTING: An observational quantitative analysis in the North Wales primary care setting. METHOD: Retrospective review of computer records across 5 GP centers from March 2020 until the end of October 2020. Data was extracted and analyzed using chi-square or fisher exact rank and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Our results have shown no significant difference in antibiotic prescribing behavior comparing face-to-face and remote consultations. CONCLUSION: Remote consultation is as effective as face-to-face consultation with regards to the assessment of tonsillitis and the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription in primary care.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Telemedicine , Tonsillitis/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Wales , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL